Trump’s energy agenda and its impact on pure technology and workers

Shortly after Donald Trump thanks to the uprisings imprisoned for attack on the US Capitol, he signed executive orders to withdraw the nation from the Paris Agreement and to keep the unexplained money for President Biden’s main achievements: $ 1.2 billion Bipartisan infrastructure law and act of reduction of inflation – that Congress funds had already approved and allocated.

Trump has pledged to “release America’s energy potential”, referring to the country’s oil and natural gas resources. This strategy will destroy America’s long -term potential, damaging the clean economy and national well -being.

Trump’s goal is to flood internal markets to reduce energy prices, especially as demand for electricity increases due to new data centers and artificial intelligence. That sounds good on paper. However, the US is already the world’s leading oil and gas producer, and the federal government does not dictate exploratory oil and gas decisions. Moreover, municipal services increased the storage of wind, sun and record batteries in 2024, calculating 94% of all such capacity supplements.

“Over the past two years, this country has invested more than $ 130 billion in new factories – in red countries and blue countries – to build solar panels, advanced batteries and other ingredients. We have plenty of factory capacities To meet our internal demand for solar panels.

Deans spoke at a virtual press event organized by the United States Energy Association, where I was a panelist. Last year, investors inserted $ 2.1 trillion in renewable energy worldwide. Meanwhile, 200 countries have pledged to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions under the climate agreement in Paris, which aims to alleviate the most harmful effects of global warming: rising temperatures, droughts and floods.

The other panelists disagreed with the statements of the deans or the added context for them, stressing that the main purpose of electricity policy in the US should be affordability, access and reliability. They emphasized that coal and natural gas function all the time compared to renewable, which have 35% capacity factors because the sun does not always shine or the wind does not blow constantly. Therefore, renovations require the generation of copying or storage of the battery, which increases the cost.

Renewable triple

If the treatment of climate change challenges is the ultimate goal, climate analysts say we need to triple our renewable use by 2030. Delay of this objective will lead to economic and environmental costs for our communities. Consider this: According to the law on inflation reduction, the private sector has announced at least 210 important green energy projects and clean vehicles across the country. According to findings from non -partisan environmental entrepreneurs, these projects will create 74.118 jobs and attract $ 86.3 billion – if they come to realization.

In 2024, the US suffered economic losses from natural disasters reaching approximately $ 217.8 billion, with secured losses reaching $ 112.7 billion. Hellenistic Hurricanes and Milton caused these losses. Fires in California estimated for 2025 are expected to cost between $ 28 billion and $ 75 billion. Worldwide, the losses provided in 2024 amounted to $ 145 billion, Aon notes.

According to the bank Lazard, renewable energy is the cheapest form of electricity. Their ordering in terms of cost, says that raw power at sea is less expensive, followed by natural solar cycle plants, combined gas cycle plants, gas point plants and nuclear energy.

To further emphasize the point, a Harvard University study of 2019 estimated that health -related costs from fossil fuel air pollution are $ 820 billion a year. The International Monetary Fund estimates that health costs from air -related air -related air pollution range from $ 2.9 trillion to $ 8.1 trillion per year. The Environmental Protection Agency has said the social cost of carbon is between $ 50 and $ 200 per tonne. The social cost of carbon is economic damage associated with CO2 emissions.

“For the last 35 years, we have burned more coal, gas and oil globally than in history. We have raised the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by 20% at its highest level, “Deans says. Way not to continue to destroy communities and life. “

One of the measures it has implemented that Trump has implemented is the regulation of rules on coal power plants-a release for coal-producing states. However, Dan Brouillette, the Secretary of the US Energy Department from 2019 to 2021 under Trump, notes that while services work to provide reliable power, they remain committed to reduce their emissions. “All of them are dedicated to cleaner energy, but they are also committed to 24/7 power.”

The role of energy in the global economy

He adds, “When we look at world history again, we see behind the conflicts that this nation has fought throughout generations. Many, if not all, had any connection with energy, energy production and availability of energy. So it is one of the basic things you consider as president. “

To this end, the US Energy Information Administration projects an increase in a 10-15% demand by 2030, driven mainly by new data centers and one that requires a sustainable source of energy. Lack, meanwhile, will raise prices. The same agency says that natural gas provides 43% of all electrical generation in this country, while renovations make up 20%. Both often work together, as natural gas supports renewable energy, but so does battery storage.

Many panelists agreed that the solution is not in a single source of energy, but in a mixture of fuel-a strategy of all energy. Scott Segal, co-chair of the Bracewell Policy Solving Group, who represents municipal services, challenged several environmental points. He claims that “externalities” have wider applications than just health and environmental costs that are not included in energy prices.

“You can’t take into account the externations associated with coal mines,” he says. “You also need to consider what happens to those less capable of withstanding high energy costs – for their home budgeting.” Segal notes that his firm surveyed communities near oil refineries, revealing that they were “favorablely set for the continuous functioning and expansion” of plants. “The concerns of the first line communities are being addressed through the permit process.”

However, discharge of Trump’s climate change and the snubing of the Paris Agreement are bright omissions in the “all above” energy strategy. Moreover, his executive order to ban funds for green energy and infrastructure legislation adopted under Biden opposes American jurisprudence; He cannot unilaterally overturn the laws.

Meanwhile, Trump aims to cut search and development dollars for front technologies. While these cuts are presented as a move to efficiency, they undermine long -term strategic energy goals that pay financially and environmentally. Consider drilling clay gas or advanced battery storage – the initiatives made possible because the government provided the seed money.

“Successful countries invest in the future. We need to invest, not remove that territory for our rivals abroad. We want American workers and businesses to be the winners in that market. Research and development is seed corn for that growth, ”says Deans, with the Council of Natural Resources Protection.

The 21st century economy requires it, and Congress recognizes this, as evidenced by the abundance of green energy projects in the red and blue states.

Also from this author:

Natural gas supports renewable – a fact that Trump needs to learn

Energy companies can give the climate debate

A closest look at Trump’s Energy Secretary

Can we triple the use of renewable energy?